Revisiting The Assumed Objective of Exercise

Walk through almost any major fitness center and you’ll witness personal trainers encouraging their patrons to “Get one more!” ignoring potentially dangerous breath-holding, squirming, and the explosive unloading and reloading of the musculature – whatever it takes to complete a set, right?

Ken Hutchins termed this misunderstanding the assumed objective of exercise, the assumption that there is some importance connected to the number of repetitions one can perform. The real objective of any exercise is simply to weaken the musculature momentarily in order to stimulate the body’s natural growth response. Once stimulated, the body will attempt to recover, repair, and most importantly, over-compensate by strengthening the muscles and surrounding tissues.

Activities performed as exercise can really only do three things directly. The activity can trigger the growth response (exercise), it can prevent or interfere with the growth response (overtraining), or worse – it can directly cause an injury. Overtraining and injury are not desirable results from an exercise program, and yet, the more-is-more attitude pervades the media, fitness literature, and popular opinion.

At a leadership workshop in San Diego this week, speaker Marshall Goldsmith asked his audience to think of questions from which they might benefit if asked every single day. Presumably, knowing that the questions would be posed at the end of the day would influence the individual throughout the day toward positive behaviors which would in turn allow them to score well when answering the questions later. Ultimately, by asking the questions and monitoring their responses over time, they identify and rate their behaviors and values in a way which can lead them to greater satisfaction and happiness.

As he polled the audience, several workshop attendees wanted one of their questions to be “Did you workout today?” This is a simple yes or no question that cuts right to the chase. “Did you workout today?” Initially, it seems like an excellent question. However, this question assumes that working out every day is a healthy ideal. Yet we know that daily workouts lead directly to overtraining and quite often injuries. The question, “Did you workout today?” pays homage to the assumed objective of why we exercise.

The real reason or the primary objective for why we exercise is to improve muscular strength, which improves the body’s ability to move and function, as well as enhancing cardio-vascular and bone health. The best way to do that is NOT by working out every day. The most effective method to improve muscular strength is to weaken the musculature momentarily in order to stimulate the body’s natural growth response. Then, allow an adequate respite from exercise so the body can mend itself.

Perhaps a more appropriate question might be, “Did you give your body what it needed today?” On some days, the answer should be “Yes, I rested.”

Share This Post

About Thom Tombs

My introduction to SuperSlow took place in a rather nondescript office park in Southern California. Every day, I would walk by a nondescript "by appointment only" sign to get to the nondescript office park delicatessen. Then, I would walk by the sign again with my lunch order back to my office. Some days, I walked by the sign several times... for breakfast, for lunch, and then again for dinner. My expanding waist line and I were working a lot of hours in those days. As the Senior Director of Information Technology at a fast-growing company, I honestly believed I didn't have enough time to exercise. One day, out of curiosity, I ignored the sign and poked my head in the door. I didn't know it then, but what I discovered in that nondescript office park was about to change the course of my life forever. What I discovered was that I absolutely did have time to exercise, and that I had not even known what exercise really is. After just a few workouts, this computer nerd was actually gaining muscle! Having new muscle was inspiring me to eat better. As I began to pay attention to what went into my mouth, I started losing fat. I felt better physically, and my clothes fit better. As time went on, it seemed to me that I didn’t catch every flu bug that came by. I even stopped smoking. I’m so happy with the results I’ve achieved and the benefits that I continue to enjoy that I quit my former career, I studied to become a certified SuperSlow Instructor (now I’m a Level III Qualified Certifier for the SuperSlow Zone Institute), and together with my fiancé, we opened our own SuperSlow Zone so we can share this remarkable workout with others.
This entry was posted in General Exercise, Life, Technique and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Revisiting The Assumed Objective of Exercise

  1. Justin Smith says:

    Great points! Ken Hutchin’s writings are very clear, and this point, along with Exercise vs. Recreation, are my favs.

    Justin

    • Thom Tombs says:

      Justin, what about “exercise vs. recreation” makes it one of your favorite SuperSlow topics? Personally, I think it is an area that would benefit from more discussion. The idea that exercise is “not fun”, initially turns a lot of people off.

  2. Justin Smith says:

    Hi Thom,

    I like how it tries to describe exercise as a universal need, and recreation as a unique want. Something like that! I don’t know exactly how to phrase it.

    Justin

  3. Thom Tombs says:

    Thank you, Justin. I’m going to be writing more about a piece of this topic in the very near future. Ken discusses the “imaginary continuum of exercise effect” recognizing there is some excercise benefit in almost any activity. This continuum as well the level of benefit we ellicit as we approach muscular failure are near and dear to another area of interest that I would like to research and develop a bit – I’m calling it fuzzy failure.